Wednesday, April 2, 2008

The Lost Ring ~ a meditation

I want to meditate on the meaning of a story in Eckhart Tolle's A New Earth, but first I need to share the story itself:
"The Lost Ring"
(pp. 38-41)

When I was seeing people as a counselor and spiritual teacher, I would visit a woman twice a week whose body was riddled with cancer. She was a schoolteacher in her midforties and had been given no more than a few months to live by her doctors. Sometimes a few words were spoken during those visits, but mostly we would sit together in silence, and as we did, she had her first glimpses of the stillness within herself that she never knew existed during her busy life as a schoolteacher.

One day however, I arrived to find her in a state of great distress and anger. "What happened?" I asked. Her diamond ring, of great monetary as well as sentimental value, had disappeared, and she said she was sure it had been stolen by the woman who came to look after her for a few hours every day. She said she didn't understand how anybody could be so callous and heartless as to do this to her. She asked me whether she should confront the woman or whether it would be better to call the police immediately. I said I couldn't tell her what to do, but asked her to find out how important a ring or anything else was at this point in her life. "You don't understand," she said. "This was my grandmother's ring. I used to wear it every day until I got ill and my hands became too swollen. It's more than just a ring to me. How can I not be upset?"

The quickness of her response and the anger and defensiveness in her voice were indications that she had not yet become present enough to look within and to disentangle her reaction from the event and observe them both. Her anger and defensiveness were signs that the ego was still speaking through her. I said, "I am going to ask you a few questions, but instead of answering them now, see if you can find the answers within you. I will pause briefly after each question. When an answer comes, it may not necessarily come in the form of words." She said she was ready to listen. I asked: "Do you realize that you will have to let go of the ring at some point, perhaps quite soon? How much more time do you need before you will be ready to let go of it? Will you become less when you let go of it? Has who you are become diminished by the loss?" There were a few minutes of silence after the last question.

When she started speaking again, there was a smile on her face, and she seemed at peace. "The last question made me realize something important. First I went to my mind for an answer and my mind said, 'Yes, of course you have been diminished.' Then I asked myself the question again, 'Has who I am become diminished?' This time I tried to feel rather than think the answer. And suddenly I could feel my I Am-ness. I have never felt that before. If I can feel the I Am so strongly, then who I am hasn't been diminished at all. I can still feel it now, something peaceful but very alive."

"That is the joy of Being," I said. "You can only feel it when you get out of your head. Being must be felt. It can't be thought. The ego doesn't know about it because thought is what it consists of. The ring was really in your head as a thought that you confused with the sense of I Am. You thought the I Am or a part of it ws in the ring.

"Whatever the ego seeks and gets attached to are substitutes for the Being that it cannot feel. You can value and care for things, but whenever you get attached to them, you will know it's the ego. And you are never really attached to a thing but to a thought that has 'I,' 'me,' or 'mint' in it. Whenever you completely accept a loss, you go beyond ego, and who you are, the I Am which is consciousness itself, emerges."

She said, "Now I understand something Jesus said that never made much sense to me before: 'If someone takes your shirt, let him have your coat as well.'"

"That's right," I said. "It doesn't mean you should never lock your door. All it means is that sometimes letting things go is an act of far greater power than defending or hanging on."

In the last few weeks of her life as her body became weaker, she became more and more radiant, as if light were shining through her. She gave many of her possessions away, some to the woman she thought had stolen the ring, and with each thing she gave away, her joy deepened. When her mother called me to let me know she had passed away, she also mentioned that after her death they found her ring in the medicine cabinet in the bathroom. Did the woman return the ring, or had it been there all the time? Nobody will ever know. One thing we do know: Life will give you whatever experience is most helpful for the evolution of your consciousness. How do you know this is the experience you need? Because this is the experience you are having at this moment.

Is it wrong then to be proud of one's possessions or to feel resentful toward people who have more than you? Not at all. That sense of pride, of needing to stand out, the apparent enhancement of one's self through "more than" and diminishment through "less than" is neither right nor wrong -- it is the ego. The ego isn't wrong; it's just unconscious. When you observe the ego in yourself, you are beginning to go beyond it. Don't take the ego too seriously. When you detect egoic behavior in yourself, smile. At times you may even laugh. How could humanity have been taken in by this for so long? Above all, know that the ego isn't personal. It isn't who you are. If you consider the ego to be your personal problem, that's just more ego.

When I read this section on Sunday, the part that jumped out at me was the saying of Jesus that the woman quoted (seventh paragraph): "If someone takes your shirt, let him have your coat as well" (Matthew 5:40). Three things came to mind:

First, I heard a story at Sunday school that very morning about a man calling after a thief who had just stolen his wallet: "Wait, it's cold out here today; let me give you my coat." He removed his coat, saying, "And let me take you to lunch ... though you'll have to pay for it, since you have my wallet."

Second, I also heard that Rwanda has healed from the 1994 genocide by not focusing on the wrongs, but has forgiven and moved on. Can I verify this? No, but I had heard it not long ago, and it's on my mind.

Third, I recently finished a novel about forgiveness in South Africa, where those guilty of apartheid confessed their guilt. This form of forgiveness was said to allow closure because relatives could learn what really happened to those who disappeared. Thus the country could get on with living. The problem is that I know the oppressed in South Africa have not all put the anger and hatred behind them.
Read Crime comes home about an 82-year-old woman and her housekeeper, who were held up at gunpoint in their driveway by two thugs on February 8, 2008. Today her daughter said: "I learned from my mom that the case, following on her attack and robbery, has been closed for lack of evidence. And this less than two months after the incident. This is not the sort of thing that inspires any confidence in the police or the authorities’ ability to do anything about the rampant crime that plagues all of us in this benighted country."
So does this crime problem in South Africa mean that forgiveness doesn't work? No, I think we should look at it from another angle: An individual forgives a robber. A country forgives genocide, but have its citizens all done the same? Another country forgives apartheid, but are individuals still angry? And a broader question: Are there issues of systemic injustice still challenging the people of the land?

Ah, what lofty things the mind likes to ponder! And while I'm being so high-minded, I'm able to distance myself from what Tolle is trying to tell ME. The question I should be asking MYSELF is whether I would offer my coat in that situation, whether I could or would quit feeling angry if a relative had been tortured and killed during genocide or apartheid, whether I could release my anger and frustration if it were MY ring that had disappeared. Look at that: me, myself, and my. All indications of ego. Let's get personal here.

Though I haven't lost a ring in that way, I can relate to the feelings of the dying woman in Tolle's story. How long did it take me to "get over" the un-repaid loan of $500 to a friend? How long did I hold onto my righteous indignation about all the wrongs I attributed to my ex-husband? How long does it still take me to realize that someday I will have to let go of all "things" I consider MINE? Hmmm, when I reach that realization, maybe I won't have to keep paying monthly storage fees. That would be a good thing, wouldn't it?

2 comments:

Unknown said...

This is such an interesting post, Bonnie, because in many ways, following on my mom's robbery I asked and answered a lot of the selfsame questions. One of the things I'd always said to my mom was that she shouldn't wear the rings she did - because it made her a target. I suggested she get copies made, if she wanted, or just put the rings in the safe. But no, she insisted on wearing them, and would also use them to "taunt" me - sort of "if you're a good daughter I'll give them to you, if not, I'll give them to someone else" to which my response always was, "they're just things, Mom, and I wouldn't wear them anyway, I don't need to and I don't want the risk." Since the incident she has refused to wear any jewelery and has started giving all sorts of things away - but I suspect for all the wrong reasons.

Re, South Africa - and I'm sorry, I'm doing a whole "post" on your blog! The situation is so complex and the matter of forgiveness through the Truth and Reconciliation, whilst done with the best of intents was very much a one way street. Apartheid offenders were dragged before the Commission, the principle was one of forgiveness, but it never really worked that way - too many people were left out, too many people never participated and the greatest reality is that for many, nothing has changed, some would even say things have worsened. But, that said, the legacy left by apartheid runs terribly deep, and it becomes less about forgiveness and far more about matters of pragmatism - things like housing, employment, empowerment, health, effective policing - because, and this is critical - those who preyed on my mother, prey equally on their own people. Black South Africans suffer crime far, far worse than white South Africans because they live in the heart of the ganglands and mobsterism.
So, while it would be wonderful to bring it down to matters of forgiveness, the issues run far deeper and broader than that.
And an interesting irony is this, where they have been genuine instances of forgiveness, I think of the young American who was killed several years ago in a black ghetto, that forgiveness might touch the hearts of some, but the hearts that are already so hardened couldn't care less, one way or the other.
We could have a long conversation on this - and feel free to email me if you want to! :-)

Wanderlust Scarlett said...

I can hear the Beatles now...

I me mine
I me mine
I me mine...

and I am thinking deeply about those things that I hold on to. I was visiting with a dear friend about just this kind of thing recently.
Milady... you've inspired a new post. It's spring. Let's clean and prune, shall we?
I'll link to this.

Thank you, lady, your name is inspiration.

Scarlett & Viaggiatore